| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
Muadeeb Ousil
Minmatar
Office linebackers
Center for Disease Creation
   |
Posted - 2007.01.01 22:48:00 -
[1]
Interestingly what it dosn't state is whether they will remove the last 6 pos or whether they stay anchored off line...
I think that needs clarification, otherwise ISS would still have assets within IAC space.
|
Muadeeb Ousil
Minmatar
Office linebackers
Center for Disease Creation
|
Posted - 2007.01.01 22:57:00 -
[2]
 Originally by: Nez Perces
This is a very strange post by ISS.
Don't these kind of 'genuine' offers take place behind closed doors?.. you know between the movers and shakers away from the prying eyes of a ravenous EVE-O public?
Lets call this out as what it is...
ISS want to make an offer publicly.. that on the surface of it seems acceptable. Only ISS really suspect IAC will not take it.. or else it would have been offered in private or already has been?
IAC then have to explain to the rest of EVE, why they didnt take such a 'nice' offer.
This is an e-peen post.. make no mistake about it. Who's e-peen is bigger ISS' or IAC's?
We shall see.
I agree Nez its an attempt to force some positive public feedback for ISS and peaceful and IAC as warmongering.
Its a nice effort, it would have been a better effort if you simply just said
OK we are leaving F4 we both made mistakes we are admiting ours if you can admit your.
Status Quo restored.
That would be a little harder for IAC to turn down, but to attempt to force the peace by holding a knife at an outpost is a no brainer of a pispoor offer.
|
Muadeeb Ousil
Minmatar
Office linebackers
Center for Disease Creation
|
Posted - 2007.01.01 23:00:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Mynas Atoch
Originally by: Kaylana Syi
Hell No
Just out of curiosity, and purely as a shareholder, not as a member of MC. Is this IAC's official answer? I never could work out who spoke for or ran IAC over the last month. I always thought Tyrrax had the veto and final say on all internal discussion, but IAC always denied that.
Myn
I don't know do MC disclose their clients in this forum, last i checked not.
So i would assume if any offer was accepted or turned down it would be done in a diplomatic way via PM's. Hey but your MC you should already know that, or are you daft enough to think otherwise...
|
Muadeeb Ousil
Minmatar
Office linebackers
Center for Disease Creation
|
Posted - 2007.01.01 23:02:00 -
[4]
Edited by: Muadeeb Ousil on 01/01/2007 23:03:22
Originally by: Aeaus
Amusing how the IAC Lapdogs are making more posts then IAC themselves in this thread.
We don't have to worry about stupid posts from other Alliance's asking if that is official Alliance policy 
Go and count your Isk ISS shareholders begone with you in this thread !
|
Muadeeb Ousil
Minmatar
Office linebackers
Center for Disease Creation
|
Posted - 2007.01.01 23:07:00 -
[5]
Careful BD found all his alts today...
|
Muadeeb Ousil
Minmatar
Office linebackers
Center for Disease Creation
|
Posted - 2007.01.01 23:24:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Press Officer
Quote:
It does not matter what the offer is.. the point is Count T know for a fact IAC won't accept it. Therefore
Therefore nothing ... its called being smart ..... shall I spell it for you 
If they reject any offer behind close doors and spin the total opposite to the public and the ISS shareholders then its the smartest move ever to put it on the public table so everyone knowsin Eve whats the IAC are after ..
The ISS offered the station back after the IAC declared war on them ... its that simple.
And the offer is plainly pispoor...
Any Shareholder should be able to see that. I still think a return to the status quo would have been rejected as to much water has crossed the bridge now and more importantly IAC owe -A- something and i think i know what they want.
However at least an offer of a return to the status quo would have be seen to be more fair in the public eye.
|
| |
|